+ 1-888-787-5890  
   + 1-302-351-4405  
 
 
 
 

Essay/Term paper: Jeffersonians vs. jacksonians

Essay, term paper, research paper:  American History

Free essays available online are good but they will not follow the guidelines of your particular writing assignment. If you need a custom term paper on American History: Jeffersonians Vs. Jacksonians, you can hire a professional writer here to write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written essays will pass any plagiarism test. Our writing service will save you time and grade.

The Washington administration was the first to bring together in the

cabinet of the United States, the Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson and the

Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson and Hamilton began to

take different views when the government began to address the issue of the

old war debts and the worthless paper money left over from the days of the

Confederation. Hamilton suggested that the government should create the

Bank of the United States, which would be a public-private partnership with

both government and private investors. The Bank of the United States was to

handle the government"s banking needs. Jefferson protested because this was

not allowed by the Constitution. Hamilton opposed the view of Jefferson and

stated that the Constitution"s writers could not have predicted the need of

a bank for the United States. Hamilton said that the right to create the Bank

of the United States was stated in the "elastic" or the "necessary and

proper" clause in which the Constitution gave the government the power to

pass laws that were necessary for the welfare of the nation. " This began the

argument between the "strict constructionists" (Jefferson) who believed in

the strict interpretation of the Constitution by not going an inch beyond

its clearly expressed provisions, and the "loose constructionists"

(Hamilton) who wished to reason out all sorts of implications from what it

said". Hamilton and Jefferson began to disagree more and more. Hamilton wrote

nasty anonymous articles in John Fenno"s Gazette of the United States and

Jefferson responded to him in Philip Freneau"s National Gazette. Jefferson"s

Notes of the State of Virginia in 1787 stated that rural life was beneficial

to the government because cities and other areas of large population created

poverty, disease, and corruption. Jefferson believed that the small farmers

where the backbone of the United States. While in the Report on Manufactures

of 1791,Hamilton stated that the government should be used to develop cities,

industries, and trade Hamilton believed that "government's function is to

maintain order in a potentially chaotic society. It needs to be remote and

secure from the people's emotional uprisings".Jefferson believed the

government "needs to be limited in its powers and completely responsive to

the needs and desires of the people".Hamilton was strongest among merchants

in the cities and throughout New England while Jefferson was strongest among

artisans in the cities and throughout the South. These conflicting views

would develop in two political parties, the Federalists led by Hamilton and

the Democratic-Republicans led by Jefferson. Although both political parties

presented enticing aspects, Hamilton"s views would be the more reasonable

because Jefferson"s views were idealistic and too strict in reference to the

constitution.

The Jeffersonian beliefs were extremely idealistic. Jeffersonians"

supported a country of farmers which in theory would end famine and the

spread of disease that was commonly found in cities. However, without the

development of cities and industries there would not be a trade industry

which would allow the farmers to trade and prosper. With no trade, farmers

would not be able to market their surplus and the surplus in the American

economy would cause prices to fall. This situation would produce little

profit for farmers and eventually an stagnant economy. An economy totally

based on farming would also encounter problems if droughts and other natural

disasters interfered with their harvests. The Hamiltonian belief is more

realistic. Hamiltonians" supported the expansion of economic endeavors in

cities, in areas such as trade and other crafts. This would help keep the

economy stable and growing if the farming lands were not up to their

potential. Jefferson"s belief that the decisions in government should be

made by the people is very unrealistic and perhaps even naive. It is

sometimes human nature to change one"s views and beliefs in a wince and

citizens might follow the views of an irrational and incompetent person which

would lead the country to ruin. Hamilton said that some of the power should

be kept out of the hand of the people in order to protect the people from

making a change in government that would cause possible disasters.

Jefferson"s view would only would have worked in an perfect world.

Jefferson"s ideals for the government were too strict as it pertains to

the interpretation of the Constitution. Jefferson did not realize that the

Constitution was written in a broad manner. The Constitution was written in

such a broad way that not the laws, but the interpretation of them would

change according to the times. The interpretation was for the government of

turn to recognize what the laws are and to enforce them. The Constitution

called for freedom of speech, religion, and press. It only applied at the

time to white males while in the present it applies to men and women of all

races. Jefferson"s "strict constructionism" would have led to the downfall

of the government because the Constitution does not have the denotative

solution for every problem that the government would have encountered.

Hamilton"s view that the Constitution could not have anticipated the details

to deal with different crises, and that a wide interpretation of the

Constitution was necessary in order to carry out the government"s duties.

The Hamiltonian views were much more effective in dealing with the

government. The Hamiltonian broad interpretation ensured that the

Constitution is not considered as a 200 year old body of rigid and inflexible

laws, that make no room for improvement in an ever changing American

society.The Washington administration was the first to bring together in the

cabinet of the United States, the Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson and the

Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson and Hamilton began to

take different views when the government began to address the issue of the

old war debts and the worthless paper money left over from the days of the

Confederation. Hamilton suggested that the government should create the

Bank of the United States, which would be a public-private partnership with

both government and private investors. The Bank of the United States was to

handle the government"s banking needs. Jefferson protested because this was

not allowed by the Constitution. Hamilton opposed the view of Jefferson and

stated that the Constitution"s writers could not have predicted the need of

a bank for the United States. Hamilton said that the right to create the Bank

of the United States was stated in the "elastic" or the "necessary and

proper" clause in which the Constitution gave the government the power to

pass laws that were necessary for the welfare of the nation. " This began the

argument between the "strict constructionists" (Jefferson) who believed in

the strict interpretation of the Constitution by not going an inch beyond

its clearly expressed provisions, and the "loose constructionists"

(Hamilton) who wished to reason out all sorts of implications from what it

said". Hamilton and Jefferson began to disagree more and more. Hamilton wrote

nasty anonymous articles in John Fenno"s Gazette of the United States and

Jefferson responded to him in Philip Freneau"s National Gazette..

Jefferson"s Notes of the State of Virginia in 1787 stated that rural life

was beneficial to the government because cities and other areas of large

population created poverty, disease, and corruption. Jefferson believed that

the small farmers where the backbone of the United States. While in the

Report on Manufactures of 1791,Hamilton stated that the government should be

used to develop cities, industries, and trade Hamilton believed that

"government's function is to maintain order in a potentially chaotic society.

It needs to be remote and secure from the people's emotional

uprisings".Jefferson believed the government "needs to be limited in its

powers and completely responsive to the needs and desires of the

people".Hamilton was strongest among merchants in the cities and throughout

New England while Jefferson was strongest among artisans in the cities and

throughout the South. These conflicting views would develop in two political

parties, the Federalists led by Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led

by Jefferson. Although both political parties presented enticing aspects,

Hamilton"s views would be the more reasonable because Jefferson"s views were

idealistic and too strict in reference to the constitution.

The Jeffersonian beliefs were extremely idealistic. Jeffersonians"

supported a country of farmers which in theory would end famine and the

spread of disease that was commonly found in cities. However, without the

development of cities and industries there would not be a trade industry

which would allow the farmers to trade and prosper. With no trade, farmers

would not be able to market their surplus and the surplus in the American

economy would cause prices to fall. This situation would produce little

profit for farmers and eventually an stagnant economy. An economy totally

based on farming would also encounter problems if droughts and other natural

disasters interfered with their harvests. The Hamiltonian belief is more

realistic. Hamiltonians" supported the expansion of economic endeavors in

cities, in areas such as trade and other crafts. This would help keep the

economy stable and growing if the farming lands were not up to their

potential. Jefferson"s belief that the decisions in government should be

made by the people is very unrealistic and perhaps even naive. It is

sometimes human nature to change one"s views and beliefs in a wince and

citizens might follow the views of an irrational and incompetent person which

would lead the country to ruin. Hamilton said that some of the power should

be kept out of the hand of the people in order to protect the people from

making a change in government that would cause possible disasters.

Jefferson"s view would only would have worked in an perfect world.

Jefferson"s ideals for the government were too strict as it pertains to

the interpretation of the Constitution. Jefferson did not realize that the

Constitution was written in a broad manner. The Constitution was written in

such a broad way that not the laws, but the interpretation of them would

change according to the times. The interpretation was for the government of

turn to recognize what the laws are and to enforce them. The Constitution

called for freedom of speech, religion, and press. It only applied at the

time to white males while in the present it applies to men and women of all

races. Jefferson"s "strict constructionism" would have led to the downfall

of the government because the Constitution does not have the denotative

solution for every problem that the government would have encountered.

Hamilton"s view that the Constitution could not have anticipated the details

to deal with different crises, and that a wide interpretation of the

Constitution was necessary in order to carry out the government"s duties.

The Hamiltonian views were much more effective in dealing with the

government. The Hamiltonian broad interpretation ensured that the

Constitution is not considered as a 200 year old body of rigid and

inflexible laws, that make no room for improvement in an ever changing

American society. 

Other sample model essays:

The Washington administration was the first to bring together in the cabinet of the United States, the Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson and the Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton....
Humanities / Jewish History
The Jews are a people with a multitude of dilemmas. From the Israelite tribes to the prosperous modern day Israel , bigotry towards the Jews has been greatly evident. The Jewish race has ...
American History / JFK Conspiracy
The debate about Kennedy"s assassination has been mixed by emotional arguments array of conspiracy theories that try to explain why a popular president was shot. I believe that President John F. Kenn...
American History / JFK Jr. Plane Crash
The JFK Jr. plane crash affected our whole country this past summer. John F. Kennedy Jr. with not all that much experience decided to fly his wife, Carolyn Bassett and himself to Hyannis Port...
American History / JImmy Carter's Presidency
James Earl Carter Jr. had become the 39th president of the United States in 1976. The Democrat and once Georgia senator had promised to bring a fresh, new approach to the White House in hope...
American History / Jim Crow Laws
 Jim Crow Laws The name for the Jim Crow Laws comes from a character in a Minstrel Show. The Minstrel Show was one of the first forms of American entertainment, which s...
American History / John Adams
John Adams, who became the second president of the United States, has been accused by some historians of being the closest thing America ever had to a dictator or monarch (Onuf, 1993). Such s...
American History / John F. Kennedy Jr.
John Fitzgerald Kennedy was the 35th president of the United States. He was the youngest president ever to be elected, the first Roman Catholic president, and the first president to be born in the 20t...
American History / John F Kennedy
In another bizarre twist to a mystery that has haunted Americans for more than a quarter century, the son of a former Dallas police officer plans to tell the world that his father was one of ...
American History / John Gotti
John Gotti: The American Mobster This is a story about a New York mobster, who was the Godfather of the Gambino Family. Today he is serving a life sentence in Marion Federal Penitentiary on 4...
it is always perfect
Frederick, Maryland, United States
The experience with Dream Essay is stress free. Service is excellent and forms various forms of communication all help with customer service. Dream Essay is customer oriented. Writer 17663 is absolutely excellent. This writer provides the highest quality of work possible.
Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States
Dream Essay is excellent. Writer 7135 is excellent. Met all requirements of the paper produce superb work. Thank you for your time and an excellent paper.
Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States
Writer 37301 is excellent produces assignments ahead of deadline which provides enough time for review and revisions, and the assignments are done according to rubrics. Excellent
Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States
Only competent & proven writers
Original writing — no plagiarism
Our papers are never resold or reused, period
Satisfaction guarantee — free unlimited revisions
Client-friendly money back guarantee
Total confidentiality & privacy
Guaranteed deadlines
Live Chat & 24/7 customer support
All academic and professional subjects
All difficulty levels
12pt Times New Roman font, double spaced, 1 inch margins
The fastest turnaround in the industry
Fully documented research — free bibliography guaranteed
Fax (additional info): 866-332-0244
Fax (additional info): 866-308-7123
Live Chat Support
Need order related assistance?—Click here to submit a inquiry
© Dreamessays.com. All Rights Reserved.
Dreamessays.com is the property of MEDIATECH LTD