 |
Research Paper, Essay on Humanities, Handling the Great Depression
Free study resources: Free term papers and essays on Humanities
We are offering free complimentary access to thousands of free essays and term papers on almost every subject imaginable. The free Humanities essays do not interfere
with our services: We know how much people like free resources and just want to keep the visitors on our site and illustrate the advantages of our services by
exposing the drawbacks of using free resources. Please note that the free papers hosted on this site have been donated by college students. Those are not our writers'
products and are not indicative of the quality of our services. To examine the real quality of our services please visit the Work Samples page.
Free essays and term papers take a lot of time to find and tweak
There are thousands of free essays on-line, however, browsing through categories takes forever to finally locate the right piece. Moreover, free Humanities papers are rather
outdated and most likely will feature neither current research nor correct citations. The structure of the papers will make you spend hours to tweak in order
to finally match your professor's instructions.
Errors, typos, incorrect grammar and word choice
If you want to do your project all by yourself, we can respect that. You are free to use our free papers and tell your friends about our site. You will need to spend
hours because the papers are presented on as-is basis and we do not guarantee them to be any good. They may contain errors, types, incorrect grammar, incorrect sources,
poor research, to name just a few.
Use our services to save time and grade
If you are not willing to spend hours browsing through our essay collection and need services of a qualified writer, you can order
custom term papers or
custom essays on absolutely any subject.
You won't have to rewrite the paper because our writer will write a brand new paper in accordance with your instructions.
Buy Custom Term Paper...
Essay/Term paper: Handling the great depressionEssay, term paper, research paper: Humanities Hoover and Roosevelt had very different ideas on how the
Depression should be handled. This was almost entirely a result of two
integral differences in their schemas; Hoover was a Republican, and
had basically worked his way through life, while Roosevelt was not
only a Democrat, he had basically been born with the proverbial silver
spoon in his mouth. As one can easily see, in many ways these two are
complete opposites; in fact, if one looks at both their upbringing and
their political affiliation, it seems that Roosevelt's and Hoover's
policies must have been different in a great many ways. Hoover was
brought up in a poor family, and worked almost his entire life. When
he was eight years old, his parents died so he went to live with his
uncle. His uncle worked with him, and later became rich. Hoover had
endured a great many hardships in his life, and knew what it was like
to do without. In fact, Hoover was very poor as a child, although not
necessarily living in poverty. This effect on his schema would be
rather interesting, as it seems that he should have had a better
understanding of how to handle problems with the poor than Roosevelt.
As Hoover was born poor, one would think that he would know how to run
the country like a business, so that it would stay afloat; however,
when confronted with the Depression, he repeatedly cut taxes. Hoover
was basically a hard working Republican, the quintessential self made
man. Roosevelt, on the other hand, had been born into a very rich
family; He grew up with education at Harvard, had his own pony and
sailboat, and had everything basically taken care of for him in his
childhood by his mother. This gave him a sense of security, of being
able to do anything he wanted, most simply because he didn't fail
early on. He had never lived through what the American public was
going through, so his view of the world, his schema, did not
necessarily include what it was like to live in poverty. He believed
that the Depression could be solved merely by putting as many people
to work for the government as possible. This could relate to how,
growing up, he himself did not have to work in any way, shape, or
form. Roosevelt did have one other perspective that would always be
unavailable to Hoover; he was a cripple. He had contracted polio on
1921; by the time he became governor of New York in 1928, he could not
walk unaided. He refused to let this stop him, though, and remained a
suave speaker, unlike his competitor Hoover.
Political affiliation is also one of the most necessary
differences to realize in contrasting Hoover and Roosevelt. Hoover's
policies, when viewed form the modern perspective, seem rather
strange. One of his major efforts appears to have been lowering taxes;
he basically expressed faith in the existent American system. He
called leaders of industry to Washington D.C. and made them promise to
keep up wages and such, but when they did not he worked with local
welfare agencies. He basically refused to give out any national
welfare, believing that it demeaned proud Americans. While he
attempted much to help businesses, it was clear by 1932 that his
policies were a complete failure. Even when the Democrats had control
of the congress after 1930, he still stubbornly refused to take
stronger action. Throughout this time, the bank failures had been
steadily going up. His lowest point in popularity was when a group of
veterans camped in D.C. demanding a bonus that they were due. Hoover
ordered them removed. Yet even through all of this, he still insisted
that the American public did not honestly want national relief.
Basically, Roosevelt could have no better campaign than Hoover's
presidency. Roosevelt's philosophy, on the other hand, was entirely
different. His most readily apparent ability was his voice; he was
able to talk to people in such a way that they almost always went
along with him. He was exceptionally confident, and made those around
him feel so too. Roosevelt did not tend to deal with underlying
problems; he was, however, wonderful at taking care of the surface
problem. On his inauguration day, he gave his famous speech asserting
that the only thing America had to fear was fear itself; not entirely
true, because the nation stood on the brink of collapse. The banks in
Chicago and New York were closed. Within ten days, Roosevelt had them
back open. Throughout the next few years, Roosevelt's general policy
was to make work for anyone and everyone who was idle; it didn't
matter if the work was pointless, and didn't really need to be done.
Roosevelt simply took the men of the nation and put them to work at
whatever he could think of for them to do. The job really didn't
matter; the only reason it was there was to keep the public happy. It
is questionable how much these work projects actually helped America
to come out of the Depression; in fact, most believe that only World
War II saved America's economy. Regardless, the American spirit was
once again uplifted, and even if the Depression hadn't gone away the
American public once again felt as though they were the best country
in the world. Hoover and Roosevelt had a variety of differences, both
in their background and in their political ideas. Hoover had been born
poor, and had worked his way up to a higher station in life (partially
with the help of an uncle who came into money). Roosevelt's family,
though, possessed basically old wealth. He had whatever he wanted as a
child. As far as their political views, Hoover favored a local end to
the Depression, basically not believing that the central American
government could accomplish what was necessary. Roosevelt, on the
other hand, understood as Robert Wiebe did, that the time for island
communities was over, and it was necessary for the central power in
the country to lend a hand. |
 |