+ 1-888-787-5890  
   + 1-302-351-4405  

Essay/Term paper: Katha pollitt's argument about media being biased against liberals and allan levite's argument that media is biased against conservatives

Essay, term paper, research paper:  History Essays

Free essays available online are good but they will not follow the guidelines of your particular writing assignment. If you need a custom term paper on History Essays: Katha Pollitt's Argument About Media Being Biased Against Liberals And Allan Levite's Argument That Media Is Biased Against Conservatives, you can hire a professional writer here to write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written essays will pass any plagiarism test. Our writing service will save you time and grade.

Katha Pollitt's Argument About Media Being Biased Against Liberals and Allan
Levite's Argument That Media Is Biased Against Conservatives

In the nation Katha Pollitt argues in her article "Kissing & Telling"
that the media is against liberals, and or her views. Allan Levite in his
article for the National review, "Bias Basics," Levite argues that the medial is
biased against conservatives. Both authors present arguments with deficiencies.
They both have motives to be biased. One of them has to be right, but using the
proof the two authors sight you could not tell which one. The two columnists
each write biased columns that do not prove their points well.

In Pollitt's argument she says that the media ignores the real issue.
Which is a male harassing a female. She says that the media ignores the other
cases of more serious offenses dealing with the same subject. She sights two
other cases that she would have us believe are more commonplace than incredibly
stupid elementary school kids. Her first example is the case dealing with the
sixth grader who received death threats does not even clearly state what kind of
hate was involved. It could have been sexual harassment, or it could have been
because she carried Spam around on her forehead. She only names two cases as her
examples. So in her magical "evil people bash feminism land" her argument is
just as common as what she is complaining about, or maybe less common. No one is
trying to bash feminism. This was not planned out to happen. (I hope)

Also, kids in elementary school always are not thinking about getting
their secretaries to have sex with them for raises. Personally, I think kids are
stupid. Even I was a stupid kid. When I was in third grade a guy, Tommy, bit my
ear. Because he bit my ear I have not become accustomed to Sado Masochist gay
sex dealing around ear biting. Tommy has not been going around biting people's
ears and getting turned on by this. He now cleans pools for a living. I doubt
either of us cared at the time. Although I remember some crying. People who pee
in their pants in grade school usually do not pee in their pants when they are
grown up to be heads of the country. We would know about it if they did. Many
children form weird attractions to doing many things when they are small. I used
to think Bon Jovi was the coolest band ever. Now I laugh at my obvious
immaturity, because I do not believe that anymore. Kids have no idea what the
hell they are doing they're "dumb" and "cute." (And getting more sexual activity
than me and those bastards can't even multiply)

Even Pollitt justifies my argument of the kid does not know what the
hell he is doing. "De' Andre's whole family was famous, until they stopped
returning reporters' calls after he punched and bit a teacher." The kid probably
will not grow up, and go around biting and punching teachers.

Pollitt also tries to argue the point when she asks "And how can we
raise children to respect another's limits at 13-- and-- 30 if we think it's
cute when we do not." She compares what the kids did to "sexual aggression and
violence." This is a little bit strong comparison for a bunch of kids who
probably have wet their bed's recently. They do not exactly have secretaries to
bribe with raises yet, or wives to beat. When I think of violence the first
thing that comes to my mind is tearing one button from a skirt. (Really) I do
not think these kids are anyway dealing with anything but their own ignorance.
Charge them with stupidity or immaturity. Come on, these kids are not even old
enough to laugh in health class everytime someone says the word "penis."

Another completely bogus thing that Pollitt suggest is if John Leo, who
wrote the column on if he would have though it was so cute if the boys had
kissed other boys. Would the principal have thought that it was sexual
harassment and suspended them in the first place? I doubt it.

It would appear also that because of Pollitt's past history she does
hold some anger towards people who mess with others when they are children. She
does not appear to be too much a centrist when it comes to punishment of kids
mistreating others. In fact, she probably holds some deep psychological grudge
against kids who annoy others. Maybe to get back at the ones who annoyed and
mistreated her she decided to write this column thinking that Johnathan and De'
Andre are just like the ones who angered her. This is the first reason for bias.
There is probably a really good reason why this article is in a magazine that is
so left winged it is probably communist.

Levite's using the most incredibly dense, and stupid idea I have seen in
quite a while. To decide whether the media is liberally or conservatively biased
he uses a keyword search. Putting words into a keyword search is by no stretch
of the imagination reliable for anything. Example: If I type "free porn" into
the Internet search, InfoseekÒÓÔ I get some crap against child pornography, some
Palmala Anderson non porn stuff, some crap on pay me some money "free" service,
and actually only one real "Free Porn" site. Keyword searches take two words and
find them anywhere in the document. If I said, "I can see out over the
airplane's wing and on the right side I see a bird," according to his search I
am a pinko commie liberal bastard. A better example of keyword searches: I put
the words ultra left and right wings into the searches. Right wing gives me
information on cults. Left wing gives me information on flying. Consider Waco,
and Montana cults and militias. That was front page news every day, and I do not
seem to know of any left wing cults. Probably because using a true Democrat a
left wing cult cannot exist unless it happens to be a separate country. (See
Aaron Burr) The fact that Levite did not actually check to see what ever the
articles are on, or he just neglected to mention what they were about. If he did
not mention them, might it be because it might hurt his argument so he left that
subject out? If he did not even check the articles, why? Does he have an actual
life? Or do his statistics prove what he wants to say so he decides why go any

I also wonder how he decided upon what terms were considered offensive
to each party. Some terms considered to describe the right wing consist of
everything from white supremacist rich capitalist to Nazi. Many of the
psychotically dangerous right wing people I know skip the talk of "ultra
liberal" and "liberal attack," and go straight to "you pinko commie bastard" or
the ever popular and multi-useful derogatory comment, "fag." As other essay's
discussed in class columnist can use the terminology more often than others, but
there is still the same amount of columns biased on both sides. This is also
effected by other factors, such as editors who value comic strips more than
columnist etc.

The methods used by Levite are not sufficient proof of the claim he does
so well to argue in the first paragraph. He uses data that is based on the
actual amount of reporters and editors who are liberal and conservative from the
Los Angeles Times, and The Media Elite. If he would have used more data like the
ones he used in the first paragraph then there would be no way to actually argue
his entire essay. The first paragraph of the essay goes to prove his point
beautifully. Damn shame the other three pages are completely useless because of
the data he uses. (unless you run out of toilet paper) Quite possibly Levite's
data could be read by a left wing supporting columnist and turned around in his
face with a look into the actual articles Levite uses in his search.

If you plan on showing how something such as the media is biased then
the one collecting the research should not be biased in the first place. Biased
researchers look for what they are trying to prove instead of the whole truth,
and might disregard something that does not prove their point. My suggestion is
to get someone who hates both sides and will try to ruin them both.


Other sample model essays:

History Essays / Religion
Religion According to the dictionary "religion is the service and worship of God or the supernatural."1  I challenge that definition.  It is true that all religions do involve th...
History Essays / Apartheid In South Africa
Apartheid In South Africa APARTHEID Apartheid is the political policy of racial segregation. In Afrikaans, it means apartness, and it was pioneered in 1948 by the South African Nation...
Are Immigrants A To the U.S? Immigrants are not a burden to the U.S. Therefore, we shouldn't stop all immigration . Immigrants are hard workers and are not causing unemployment for ...
The Need for Congress in the U.S There is a definite need for Congress in the United States. It serves many roles such as making laws, implementing national policy and watching over...
History Essays / Aristotle
Aristotle Born in the year of 384 B.C. Aristotle was seen as conventional for his time, for he regarded slavery as a natural course of nature and believed that certain people were born to ...
A Study Of The Market Reforms In Post-Communist Eastern Europe With A Specific Case Study of Poland Introduction Poland, as well as it's fellow post-communist countries, face an arduous t...
History Essays / A Victory For Clinton
A Victory For Clinton Another four years, another new president? The election of 1996 for president moves closer everyday as the republican Robert Dole, and the president Bill Clinton fig...
Gogol's The Overcoat: A Whisper of Change At first glance of Nikolay Gogol's novel The Overcoat, one would only see a short story about a poor man wishing to survive in a cruel world. Howe...
Emergence of the Nuclear Age I feel the most important issue which I learned in class was of the emergence of the nuclear age. I feel that this is important due to the fact that it totall...
Paula Jones' Lawsuit Against Bill Clinton A lawsuit has been filed by Paula Jones, a clerk for the Arkansas Industrial Development Commission, for sexual harassment by then Governor Clinto...
Experience with Dream Essay - Reliable and great customer service. Quality of work - High quality of work.
Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States
Dream Essay - Very reliable and great customer service. Encourage other to try their service. Writer 91463 - Provided a well written Annotated Bibliography with great deal of detail per the rubric.
Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States
it is always perfect
Frederick, Maryland, United States
The experience with Dream Essay is stress free. Service is excellent and forms various forms of communication all help with customer service. Dream Essay is customer oriented. Writer 17663 is absolutely excellent. This writer provides the highest quality of work possible.
Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States
Only competent & proven writers
Original writing — no plagiarism
Our papers are never resold or reused, period
Satisfaction guarantee — free unlimited revisions
Client-friendly money back guarantee
Total confidentiality & privacy
Guaranteed deadlines
Live Chat & 24/7 customer support
All academic and professional subjects
All difficulty levels
12pt Times New Roman font, double spaced, 1 inch margins
The fastest turnaround in the industry
Fully documented research — free bibliography guaranteed
Fax (additional info): 866-332-0244
Fax (additional info): 866-308-7123
Live Chat Support
Need order related assistance?—Click here to submit a inquiry
© Dreamessays.com. All Rights Reserved.
Dreamessays.com is the property of MEDIATECH LTD