+ 1-888-787-5890  
   + 1-302-351-4405  

Essay/Term paper: Dual executive/president

Essay, term paper, research paper:  History Essays

Free essays available online are good but they will not follow the guidelines of your particular writing assignment. If you need a custom term paper on History Essays: Dual Executive/President, you can hire a professional writer here to write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin (plagiarism detection program), our custom written essays will pass any plagiarism test. Our writing service will save you time and grade.

Dual Executive/President

The idea of an elective head of state for the American chief executive,
in its conception, was virtually without precedent. The idea of an American dual
presidency, split between domestic and foreign arenas is itself without
precedent. A dual presidency would suit America well due to the pressures of
the office of President of the United States. As Commander-in-Chief, the
President bears incredible pressures and responsibilities. The President not
only has power in the United States, but also tremendous influence throughout
the world. It is not arrogant to change the presidency in order to manage
America's vast interests all over the globe. The US is certainly not
isolationistic anymore, so creating an office for a foreign affairs executive is
simply realistic. Thus, the President is not only torn between domestic and
foreign responsibilities, but s/he must find time to campaign. A dual presidency
with a domestic and foreign leader could divide these campaigning duties. In
addition, a dual presidency is better adapted to handle simultaneous crises. A
dual presidency is a modern day answer to the realities of the American
Essentially, the idea of a dual executive is rooted in the concept of a
plural executive. Back in the time of the writing of the Constitution, some
anti-federalists wanted a weak executive. This weak executive was called a
plural executive or an executive council. (Storing 49) The purpose of such a
plural executive was not only to weaken the executive, but also to prevent a
monarchy from ruling. In fact, an anti-federalist named Randolph opposed an
executive-of-one so much that he believed it to be the "foetus (fetus) of the
monarchy."(Storing 93) Yet today the threat of monarchy is laughable.
The proposed dual executive has no intentions of weakening that branch.
Rather, a dual executive makes the branch more efficient, focused, and in touch.
`Plural' is not a fitting term for the dual executive. This is because a
plural executive implies several office holders, or a committee. The more people,
the more chaos and disunity occurs.
In the 70th chapter of The Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton made a
case for an executive with a great deal of unity. If power was concentrated in a
single chief magistrate, then the branch would be more cohesive. Hamilton
relied on the failures of plural executive in the history of Rome and Greece to
make a case against executive councils.
Some may argue that by dividing the executive office, it saps the energy
and vigor required of the job. Inversely, it can be argued that the President
has so much to do that his energy is weakened by simply being spread too thin.
The latter is true since America is such an incredible world power. When
Hamilton was writing against a plural executive, he never could have predicted
America's role in the world.
An example of what this dual executive is not, is Uruguay's multi-member
presidency. From 1918 to 1933 the directly elected nine-member National Council
of Administration shared executive power with the President. The Council took
care of domestic affairs. Note that there is a divide between domestic and
foreign duties.
Such a presidency was intended to be more representative, but simply
made the government more fragmented. Within time, Uruguay's multi-member
presidency fell to a dictator because it was an ineffectual entity. There were
simply too many members. That is why this dual presidency is composed of only
two members of the same party who would run together, and rule together.
The proposed dual presidency is quite united. The job of the President
has expanded, and so should the office. A dual presidency should be thought of
as an extension of the single presidency.
These two leaders would run together in elections under the same party.
Both would have the same four year terms, with two term limits. The idea is that
the presidency is still one entity. It is the same job as a single executive,
but the responsibility is thinned out. Each bill, treaty, or appointment would
be approved by both Presidents. Some bills, treaties, and appointments could
affect both Presidents, which is why dual approval is necessary. Such
precautions must be taken to maintain unity in the executive branch.
Both the domestic and the executive President would choose a vice-
president. Essentially four people would end up running under one party. Other
than that, the presidential election process would remain the same.
Meanwhile, the impeachment process should apply only to the individual
offender. One President cannot help it if the other committed an impeachable
offense. The other should not be punished for it. The vice-president for the
person who was impeached would fill the office in that situation. After the
vice-president, the succession process would remain the same.
The foreign affairs President would be the Commander-in-Chief of the
armed forces in actions abroad. Yet, the domestic President could use the armed
forces on American soil for natural disaster relief, or whatever else it is used
for today. In addition, the Presidents would also have the power to grant
reprieves and pardons. Both actions are subject to dual approval.
When disputes arise between the two Presidents, the issue would be
formally put in writing. The issue could then be put before a two-thirds house
vote for approval. The house would be the Presidential mediator. In the oath of
office, the Presidents should be reminded that they are not supposed to be
working against each other, but working together.
Both Presidents would give a State of the Union address. The domestic
address would be more of a summary of the state of the Union. Meanwhile the
foreign address would be about the state of the Union in relation to the rest of
the world.
The foreign President would receive ambassadors and other public
ministers. Meanwhile the domestic President would be to meet with state
Governors, members of Congress, and so forth. Any situations that fall in
between those two categories should be addressed by both Presidents.
One special power the domestic President would have would be that of
nominating judges to the Supreme Court. The foreign President's approval would
not be necessary. Thus, the final approval for the judges would be carried out
the traditional way.
The cabinet would be divided along presidential lines, and would be
appointed by the corresponding President. The domestic President would need the
Attorney-General , Postmaster-General, Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of
Agriculture, and the Secretary of Labor. The foreign President would need the
Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Commerce. Both would share the
Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, and other Secretaries as needed.
One beneficial aspect of having a dual presidency is that it may take
some of the media's scrutiny off the office. In other words, it may displace the
blame. Yet, by breaking up the focus, the personality and charisma of a
President would become less of an issue. It must be kept in mind that this is
just speculation.
In conclusion, turning the presidency into two halves of a whole would
alleviate some of the vast responsibilities of being leader of the world's
largest superpower. Hamilton was right that the executive needs unity. Yet
unlike Hamilton's views, the presidency can be divided, and kept a harmonious


Other sample model essays:

History Essays / Economic Espionage
Economic Espionage A small Mississauga electronics safety equipment company is broken into. Although filing cabinets and desks were rummaged through, nothing was seemingly taken. An office...
China Between The Fall Of The KMT and Mao Tse-Tung's Death The time from 1949-1976 was a time of transition for China. Many social and economic changes occurred through this period....
History Essays / Effects Of Youth Crime
Effects of Youth Crime A kid walks down the crowded hallway at school. He is late to his class so he is going as fast as he can. In his hurry, he accidentally bumps into another kid. Th...
Reason Why Elections Are Less Democratic The reason why elections are less democratic is because some people say that money is taking away from our well known democracy, but in other instanc...
History Essays / Judicial Choices
Judicial Choices Supreme Court conformations, much like everything else in politics and life, changed over the years. Conformations grew from insignificant and routine appointments to vit...
History Essays / Euthanasia
Euthanasia "It is conceivable, that life can deteriorate to the point where persons lose their dignity and self-respect and are unable to communicate; life in such a form no longer...
Political Science / Euthanasia: The Right To Die
Euthanasia: The Right to Die Thesis: Euthanasia should be legalized so, if we ever have a loved one that is suffering and death is certain, that we have the choice to ease their pai...
History Essays / Farewell To Manzanar
Farewell To Manzanar In the true story "Farewell to Manzanar" we learn of a young girl's life as she grows up during World War II in a Japanese internment camp. Along with her family and ...
The Importance of Theoretical Frameworks For Understanding Foundations of Political Science The importance of theoretical frameworks is essential for understanding foundations for political...
Personal Freedom In the United States of America No other democratic society in the world permits personal freedoms to the degree of the United States of America. Within the last si...
Experience with Dream Essay - Reliable and great customer service. Quality of work - High quality of work.
Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States
Dream Essay - Very reliable and great customer service. Encourage other to try their service. Writer 91463 - Provided a well written Annotated Bibliography with great deal of detail per the rubric.
Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States
it is always perfect
Frederick, Maryland, United States
The experience with Dream Essay is stress free. Service is excellent and forms various forms of communication all help with customer service. Dream Essay is customer oriented. Writer 17663 is absolutely excellent. This writer provides the highest quality of work possible.
Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States
Only competent & proven writers
Original writing — no plagiarism
Our papers are never resold or reused, period
Satisfaction guarantee — free unlimited revisions
Client-friendly money back guarantee
Total confidentiality & privacy
Guaranteed deadlines
Live Chat & 24/7 customer support
All academic and professional subjects
All difficulty levels
12pt Times New Roman font, double spaced, 1 inch margins
The fastest turnaround in the industry
Fully documented research — free bibliography guaranteed
Fax (additional info): 866-332-0244
Fax (additional info): 866-308-7123
Live Chat Support
Need order related assistance?—Click here to submit a inquiry
© Dreamessays.com. All Rights Reserved.
Dreamessays.com is the property of MEDIATECH LTD